1 Faerisar

One Is Not Born A Woman One Becomes One Essay

Comparison Of One Is Not Born A Woman By Wittig And The Second Sex Simone De Beauvoir

The construction of gender is based on the division of humanity to man and woman. This is impossible ontologically speaking; because the humans are not divided, thus gender is merely an imaginary realm. It only exist in the language exercises, and the way that cultural products are conceived in them. This essay is a preliminary attempt to offer an analysis of ‘One Is Not Born a Woman’ by Wittig and ‘The Second Sex’ by Simone De Beauvoir holds on the language usage contribution to the creation of genders and the imagined femininity.
Through the society imaginations of genders, the society character can be depicted and captured in this imagery. This virtual representation, the study of an enduring public attitude deceptive in the widespread images of a gender and the ways of representing gender, has proved a productive and enlightening field of research. The stylistic dynamics at work in the genesis and propagating of gender images in the linguistic discourses, and their explicit function, and how they are received is a crucial source in forming a base for the female status in any society. Simone De Beauvoir (2011) addresses the ambiguous imagined femininity by saying “to be considered [as women] she must share in that mysterious and threatened reality known as femininity”. Such ‘mysterious and threatened reality’ is indeed independent of facts as this paper shall revel, and they neither mirror the female reality nor provide a truthful reflection of the female, but purely part of the cultural imagination.
Monique Wittig, a radical feminist, illuminates, “For what makes a woman is a specific social relation to a man, a relation that we call servitude”. The concept of justifying the female inferior image based on biology and the ‘woman’ classification is rejected by Wittig. She argue that the women’s identity is not an intrinsic human reality. Gender, therefore, is the social and cultural description of psychosocial and behavioral traits of the sexes (Bolin, 2009). If gender is the cultural product of sex, than sex and the body are the effects of or are formed by discourse. This does not mean that sex and the body are imaginary or are somehow created by language. Rather the body itself becomes gendered through continual bodily acts, a process termed “performativity” (Rose, 2010).
In Wittig’s view, the female becomes a woman based upon the collective concepts of sexuality and gender. She remarkably discredit the Man/Woman grouping to create a different genderless category. This opinion based on the logic that humans beings convey within themselves an ever-unfolding awareness of who they are and what they are capable of accomplishing. The individual’s sense of identity is not dogged by sex, genitalia, or assumed gender role. Consequently, the individual character and abilities cannot be limited by what society considers to be feminine or masculine behavior (Adams, 2000).
The supposition that gender roles are biologically specified is a...

Loading: Checking Spelling

0%

Read more

Simone De Beauvoir Essay

734 words - 3 pages Simone De Beauvoir - Essay Pd. 6/7 Throughout history, women have been portrayed as the passive, subdued creatures whose opinions, thoughts, and goals were never as equal as those of her male counterparts. Although women have ascended the ladder of equality to some degree, today it is evident that total equalization has not been achieved....

Simone De Beauvoir Essay

688 words - 3 pages Simone De Beauvoir - Essay Pd. 6/7      Throughout history, women have been portrayed as the passive, subdued creatures whose opinions, thoughts, and goals were never as equal as those of her male counterparts. Although women have ascended the ladder of equality to some degree, today it is evident that total equalization has not been achieved. Simone De Beauvoir, feminist and existential theorist, recognized and...

Simone DeBeauvoir The Second Sex

1882 words - 8 pages Simone De Beauvoir's book, The Second Sex, takes us on a tour from thebeginning of human race to the contemporary...

One is Born a Woman

1976 words - 8 pages For as long as humanity has existed, or anthropologically speaking Homo Sapien Sapien, it is intuitive to accept male and female must also exist. Anatomically it is apparent the human species is not asexual, and thus the different sexes must necessarily serve some purpose. Strictly speaking that purpose would...

Yu Hua, To Live (a novel) What does Yu’s story of one (fictional) man tell you about the second half of the 20th century that Spence’s textbook does not, or cannot?

832 words - 3 pages Witnesses and HistoriansChu WangProfessor Lipman04/27/10Witnesses and HistoriansWitnesses and historians are the two distinctive groups of people in recording important historical moments. Witnesses observe history by living through it. Historians observe history by gathering and analyzing witnesses' accounts. Yet the major difference between witnesses and historians is the knowledge of what...

Stress and How it Affects Your Health (Second Try, The first one I did not put everything in the correct way)

1835 words - 7 pages AbstractIt is very interesting to look at how stress affects so many different areas of our lives. Everyone handles stress differently and some people don't get as stressed out about things as others do. One thing that I have learned is that if we learn to handle stress with a positive attitude and don't try to avoid it, (Because it is unavoidable) we may actually reap positive benefits from these stressful situations. If we leam to deal with...

A Comparison of A Vendetta by Guy de Maupassant and The Red Room by H.G. Wells

1517 words - 6 pages A Comparison of A Vendetta by Guy de Maupassant and The Red Room by H.G. Wells I am aiming to look at the differences and similarities of two writer's methods of creating tension in their stories. The two stories I am looking at are 'A Vendetta' by Guy de Maupassant and 'The...

Is The Second Sex Beauvoir's Application of Sartrean Existentialism?

3687 words - 15 pages Is The Second Sex Beauvoir's Application of Sartrean Existentialism? ABSTRACT: Simone de Beauvoir's 1949 feminist masterpiece, The Second Sex, has traditionally been read as an application of Sartrean existentialism to the problem of women. Critics have claimed a Sartrean origin for Beauvoir's central theses: that under patriarchy woman is the Other, and that 'one is not born a woman, but becomes one.' An analysis of Beauvoir's recently...

The title of this essay is Alexandra A. Maldonado. Alexandra one of the great mexican painter of the U.s. He was born in 1901 and died in 1989.

868 words - 3 pages AlexandraA.MaldonadoIn 1861 to 1872, Mexico's President Benito Ju rez initiates economic and political reforms designed to benefit the poor. And from 1884 to 1911, Porfirio D & Iacuteaz was president of Mexico. But n 1901, was the birth of Alexandra A. Maldonado n Mazatl n, Sinaloa, Mexico. He was only ten years ole when Diaz was over thrown & thousands of families including Maldorado's family, immigrated to the...

Is one naturally born a good citizen?

539 words - 2 pages Are humans born good citizens or do they have to earn their right to be called that? I believe that one must earn the respect of others and do some good throughout their live to be called a "good citizen." Of course when you're born you have the traits of your parents, so if they are good citizens then you must be, right? Wrong, once you grow up you ultimately have the...

Comparing The Scarlet Letter by Hawthorne to The Other by de Beauvoir

1428 words - 6 pages In The Scarlet Letter, Hawthorne describes Hester as an enigma of womankind instilling his views of Puritanism and the role of the woman into the heroine. In de Beauvoir's essay, The Other, she introduces the role of woman as seen by men in society. Both writers have developed a clear idea of the purpose of woman in society. Yet there are variations in...

My first encounter with Simone de Beauvoir took place in the late 1960s, amidst student anti-war strikes, blazing ROTC buildings, and the mind-blowing challenges that feminism, black power, and the counterculture posed to my Midwestern rural beginnings. I was one of those young women Toril Moi describes in her review of the new translation of The Second Sex, eagerly devouring the book, awakened by something new. My sense of discovery was so transformative that, forty years later, some of those striking passages retrieve it vividly: “the body is not a thing, it is a situation”(p. 46); “one is not born, but rather becomes, [a] woman” (p. 283).1 I did not know it was possible to think like that. It was world-making.

I am pleased to return to Beauvoir through the productive lens of these essays. While the new translation of The Second Sex occasioned this symposium, it does not limit the authors, who both focus on this text and range beyond it. These essays raise questions that we, as contemporary feminist and other critical theorists, need to ask: what tools does Beauvoir give us to work with? Where did she go wrong? Which of her struggles are also ours? Beauvoir’s determination to honor ambiguity rather than iron it out, her focus on process rather than static essence, her insistence that we are always already embodied and located actors– these and other insights point us toward a Beauvoir that we can use. Yet these key feminist insights are not uniformly utilized in Beauvoir’s own work, pointing to limitations that Beauvoir herself, these essays suggest, may help us address.

These essays also reflect, from different angles, on the political implications of Beauvoir’s authorial voice. The voice of Beauvoir’s texts shifts frequently, moving among her own point of view, the perspectives of other writers, and the implicit gaze of hegemonic masculinity that she articulates in order to contest. These shifts are often unannounced, causing confusion that can, these authors argue, be productive, enacting rather than merely describing the utter resistance of her subject matter to a quick summing up. Beauvoir’s prose is often characterized by a relentless listing of particular examples, urgently summoning a series of specific instances; this aesthetic practice, these essays indicate, can also be a political opportunity. Indicating Beauvoir’s significance as an interlocutor, these essays find resources within Beauvoir’s arguments to address their limitations.

Lori Marso’s opening essay uses Beauvoir to bring embodiment into theory, undermining any pretense to a “god’s eye” view because thinking is always already in the flesh. Beauvoir’s critique of the “Eternal Feminine” targets longstanding efforts by some male political thinkers to uncouple themselves from the messy facticity of bodies by attributing them ontologically to women, while mind or soul is claimed at an equally abstract level for men. Beauvoir, Marso argues, not only critiques old dualisms of mind vs. body, biology vs. society; she enacts a thinking that crosses categories, vigorously mixing philosophy, history, biology, and autobiography, examining her own sexed and gendered life world for data just as she examines texts and arguments. Marso’s essay pulls the concept of ambiguity to center stage, and follows its implications: efforts to impose single meanings or resolve tensions within complex relations are bound to fail; far better, Marso suggests, to embrace ambiguity and make productive use of its fractures. Hegemonic femininity, both Beauvoir and Marso insist, entails contradictions with which women must struggle, and they do so in many different ways. Finding Beauvoir lacking in her discussion of “women” and “blacks” as if they were mutually exclusive categories, Marso nonetheless finds resources within the concept of ambiguity to address Beauvoir’s lack of intersectional thinking.

Linda Zerilli’s essay takes up the way that subsequent feminists have inherited Beauvoir’s legacy. Refusing to lionize or demonize Beauvoir, Zerilli asks why so many feminist readers have evidently felt the need to do one or the other (while pointing out how the one generates the other). Many feminists, Zerrilli finds, keep trying to settle what Beauvoir keeps unsettled in subjectivity and politics; these feminists are looking for solace in all the wrong places, and fail to appreciate Beauvoir’s insistence that confusion and uncertitude are vital conditions of productive feminist thinking. Contrary to those who still cast Beauvoir as Sartre in a skirt, Zerilli sees Beauvoir moving away from Sartre’s ontology of battling consciousnesses and recognizing relationality, based on concrete circumstances and subject to renegotiation. For Zerrilli, the proliferation of examples is a strategy to de-essentialize; Beauvoir’s achievement is to use so many competing examples that she shows us, rather than simply tells us, that it is impossible to simply define women. Through Zerilli’s interventions, we find a Beauvoir who helps us look usefully at women as political subjects in complex circumstances.

Diane Rubenstein’s reflections on Beauvoir’s book America Day by Day situates Beauvoir’s voice in the context of European travel narratives on the United States. Rubenstein shows us a profound Tocquevillian narrative, an account of a journey that is also a work of theory. Beauvoir’s America defamiliarizes; it jostles expectations through unexpected encounters. Just as Marso and Zerrilli found the multitude of examples in The Second Sex to dislocate the “Eternal Feminine,” Rubenstein takes the dense network of particular encounters in America to make familiar patterns hard to assume. Beauvoir’s self-understanding is woven into her encounters, and produced by them; she thinks the world by thinking herself and others in the world. Rubenstein notes the significance of Beauvoir’s friendship with Richard and Ellen Wright for her encounters with racial politics in the United States. Beauvoir grasped her friends’ situatedness, not as an abstract experience of Otherness but an historical and material encounter with their life worlds. Rubenstein shows us Beauvoir resubjectivizing herself, delighting in “the extraordinary adventure of becoming a different me” (America Day by Day, 3).

Sally Markowitz’s essay returns to the debates about Beauvoir’s understanding of human consciousness, this time through amplifying Beauvoir’s engagements with Marx. Markowitz concurs that Beauvoir does not essentialize women, but Markowitz worries about an even grander universalism ontologizing oppositional human consciousness itself. By closely tracking Beauvoir’s reading of Engels, Markowitz excavates and problematizes Beauvoir’s reliance on an ontology of immanence and transcendence. Markowitz’s direction of argument encourages us to further historicize and specify our analysis of subjectivity, and to be rightfully wary of the reemergence of universal claims when we thought we had put them to rest.

Markowitz’s investigation of Beauvoir’s relation to Marx poses urgent questions for feminist thinking, questions that the other authors in the symposium can help us to address. Imagine if Beauvoir had actually returned to The Second Sex and reframed it around Marx’s materialism rather than Hegel’s psychological universals. Beauvoir’s orientation toward the specifics of things, combined with attention to the material circumstances of bodies and identities and commitment to retaining complexity rather than resolving it – these orientations could have led Beauvoir to a rethinking of the unreflective orientalism that sometimes crops up in The Second Sex. While in Beauvoir’s later writing, she was an outspoken critic of French colonialism in Algeria, in The Second Sex she sometimes characterizes the nonwestern world as a timeless patriarchy, while France comes to stand for modernity itself.2 For example, a small footnote indicates that her study is confined to “the western world” because “the history of the woman in the east in India and in China was one long and immutable slavery. From the middle ages to today, we will center this study on France, where the situation is typical” (p. 89). Today, that is a jaw-dropping colonial presumption. If Beauvoir had returned to The Second Sex with stronger insistence on full historical and material investigations of all women’s lives, if she had brought her insistence that “it is never possible to close the books” (p. 46) to bear on the global study of women, we could have inherited a different Second Sex. While Beauvoir did not take up this challenge for us, the essays in this symposium assist us in following such leads ourselves.

In 1984, I met Simone de Beauvoir in Paris. I took with me my ragged copy of The Second Sex, highlighted in multiple colors and held together with a rubber band. She smiled graciously at the obvious love and desire revealed in those worn, marked pages, and autographed the book for me. Now I return to that book, and to Beauvoir’s larger corpus, still savoring the gratitude I felt for the world of possibility she opened for so many of us. The tools of feminist theory and critical theory more generally, tools Beauvoir helped to invent, let us rethink her. The work of this symposium both helps us to do our work and honors a longstanding debt.

Leave a Comment

(0 Comments)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *