Capital Punishment Essay Conclusion Help
The Death Penalty
- Length: 1460 words (4.2 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
The Death Penalty
"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." This is another way for someone to
say they are supportive of the death penalty. The death penalty, to me, is
revenge. It kills innocent people every year. Many of the families of
victims do not want the criminals to be put to death. The death penalty
costs more than a life sentence in jail. It is also racists.
"Since 1976, there have been five hundred twenty-three executions in
the United States, twenty-three in 1999 alone. There was only eleven before
1984. Then the number rose to twenty-one that year. The number of execution
stayed around twenty then dropped to eleven in 1988. Then it steadily rose
from there to seventy-four executions in 1997. That was the highest since
1976."(Death Penalty Information Center, P.1)
There are many different methods of execution used by the government.
The most common is lethal injection used by thirty-four states.
Electrocution is another method, which is used by ten states. The gas
chamber is used in five states. There are still two states today that use
hanging as a method of execution. And two other states use a firing squad.
The death penalty is also extremely racist. There have been
significantly more executions of minorities than white Americans. Capital
punishment also goes against the Constitution of the United States.
Amendments eight and fourteen state that no cruel and unusual punishment can
be inflicted, and no state can deprive any person of life liberty or
property. The death penalty clearly takes these privileges away from
"More than 2000 people are on death row today. Virtually all are
poor, a significant number are mentally retarded or other wise mentally
disabled. More than forty percent are African American and disproportionate
numbers are Native American, Latino, and Asian." (American Civil Liberties
Union) It does not seem fair that only these people are dying. The
Constitution states that everyone should be given a fair trial. These
statistics do not prove to me that these people had a fair trial.
Everybody makes mistakes. If a jury makes a mistake and a person is falsely
accused of murder when they find out they messed up they want to take the
How to Cite this Page
| The Death Penalty Essay - The death penalty continues to be an issue of controversy and is an issue that will be debated in the United States for many years to come. According to Hugo A. Bedau, the writer of “The Death Penalty in America”, capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty. The death penalty has been used since ancient times for a variety of offenses. The Bible says that death should be done to anyone who commits murder, larceny, rapes, and burglary. It appears that public debate on the death penalty has changed over the years and is still changing, but there are still some out there who are for the death penalty and will continue to believe that it’s a good punishment.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 3 Works Cited
| Essay on The Death Penalty - Almost all nations in the world either have the death sentence or have had it at one time. It was used in most cases to punish those who broke the laws or standards that were expected of them. Since the death penalty wastes tax money, is inhumane, and is largely unnecessary it should be abolished in every state across the United States. The use of the death penalty puts the United States in the same category as countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia which are two of the world’s worst human rights violators (Friedman 34).... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 7 Works Cited
| The Death Penalty Essay - As of January 1, 2010, 3,261 people live on death row (“Death”). Fewer than 3,261 people live in my small town of Belle Plaine, so to me this number is outrageous. Inmates that wait on the death penalty jail create a problem for everyone in the country. If we would put these inmates through the death penalty quickly, we could take the problem away from the country. Why do we keep murderers and criminals on death row around. People argue the controversial topic of the death penalty very thoroughly, and address all sides.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 8 Works Cited
| Essay on The Death Penalty - Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners. Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that the death penalty doesn’t really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the Declarat... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 11 Works Cited
| Essay on The Death Penalty - Today, many criminals are getting away with very little or no punishment for the crimes they are committing. One of these thugs could be walking down the street in your neighborhood hunting for their next victim. These criminals have no remorse concerning what they have done; they are just looking for an opportunity to strike again. However, if someone asked what your thought is on the death penalty, most would probably say that they are against it that is until a family member or someone you love is walking down the street and that man who was looking for their next victim found them.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 14 Works Cited
| The Death Penalty Essay - The death penalty is currently used by 34 states and is used by the federal government for punishing federal crimes. And in most cases the death penalty is used when the criminal has been convicted of murder. However, two people have been sentenced to death for the rape of a minor. The definition of the death penalty is: execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. This begs the question does the government have the right to take away someone’s life.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Essay The Death Penalty - The most severe of all sentences: that of death. Also known as the death penalty, capital punishment is the most severe form of corporal punishment as it is requires law enforcement officers to kill the offender. It has been banned in many countries. In the United States, an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reversed and more and more states are resorting to capital punishment for serious offenses such as murder. In this essay, I will elaborate on capital punishment and on the cases of Joe Guy, Tommy Zeigler, Leroy Orange, and Charles Munsey.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay - "More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no longer giving any excuses for killing humans.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Abolishing the Death Penalty Essay - A number 1263 men and women have been executed in the United States in the twenty five years ever since the Supreme Court has reintroduced the death penalty in 1976. Executions have been carried in the 34 states with the death penalty, with more than 80% taking place in the south. Texas and Virginia being the two top death penalty states with a shared number of 580 people executed. The death penalty is a controversial issue that has been debated for years. Proponents of the death penalty say it is justice better served, away of retribution or “an eye for an eye,” to bring closure to the families of murder victims.... [tags: capital punishment, death penalty]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Essay on Politics and The Death Penalty - The question regarding whether the United States should implement the death penalty as a form of punishment is a heated issue in American politics. The topic is so divisive because it deals with death, which is permanent. Life is valued in every society, and when life is taken away, emotions rise. Most human beings maintain a strong underlying fear of dying, so they wish to prevent their own death, especially their murder, at any cost. Furthermore, since crime is a prevalent problem in the U.S., Americans yearn for a successful way to reduce the homicide rate.... [tags: the anti-death penalty position]|
:: 35 Works Cited
Death Penalty Native American States Today American Citizens Death Row African American Unusual Punishment Firing Lethal
sentence away. If the sentence is life in prison, they can tell the person
they are sorry and they can go free. It does not work that way if they
sentence a person to death.
If a jury falsely accuses a person of a crime they did not commit
with a sentence to death, they can not take it back. It will be too late.
The person will not be able to get their life back. Every year four innocent
people are put to death. "Since 1976, seventy people on death row were found
innocent of the charges they were accused of." (Death Penalty Information
Although some people feel the death penalty is a good thing, I think it is
wrong. When someone has committed the crime of murder it creates a great
loss for the victims family. Does putting the killer to death make the
family of the victim feel any better? They still have to live with the loss
of their loved one for the rest of their lives. Taking the life of someone
else does not redeem the life of the person that was killed.
In many cases, the families of the victims do not want the murderer to be put
to death. One case I read about a nine year-old girl was abducted and
murdered. Her father said, "She was shy, joyous, and happy she would never
hurt anybody. Hurting someone for her would not really be for her, would not
honor her, or help us." (Diego Ribadeneira, p.2) What he said is true, it
does not help the victim or the family to kill the criminal. Her father knew
she would not want anyone to be hurt for her so the death penalty would not
help in any way.
When we put criminals on death row for committing the crime of murder, we are
stooping to their level. Murderers are not role models. Why should we
follow what they do and kill them in return? "An eye for an eye makes the
whole world blind."(Ghandi) If we kill people for killing other people we
are basically saying murder is a good choice. If the government can say that
a person deserves to die then why can't an ordinary person do the same?
Last year in Boston, a fifteen year-old boy was killed in a fight over
jewelry. The boy, Cerrone Hemingway, was shot in the head and died. A
family member said, "The notion that your child must die because my child
died? That does not satisfy. It does not bring peace. It only turns our
hearts to stone." (Diego Ribadeneira, p.3)
This family experienced the great loss of having a loved one killed. Yet
they still do not feel it is right to put the killer to death. If the family
of the victim does not think the killer deserves to die, who has the right to
say they should die? The family is the one who is suffering so they should
have the right to say they do not want to kill anyone.
Sometimes murderers will kill themselves after committing the crime so they
will not have to face the consequences of what they have done. That, to me,
is taking the easy way out. These people would rather be dead, as well as
the people they killed, then spend the rest of their lives in jail. It is a
proven fact that the murder rates are lower in states that have done away
with the death penalty. No one wants to spend his or her life wasting away
The death penalty is another easy way out. If a person commits a crime as
horrible as murder they would probably rather die themselves then sit in
prison for the rest of their lives. They have so much free time to think
about how they mad the wrong choice. I feel they should have to suffer
through that in jail not end their lives right away. Life in prison should
be their punishment not death.
There is a debate going on now in Massachusetts on whether or not the death
penalty should be implemented. Cardinal Bernard Law, the leader of the
Archdiocese of Boston, said, "The teachings of the church are clear, for a
well-informed Catholic to support capital punishment, it would be morally
wrong. And if one knowingly rejects the teachings of the church it is wrong,
morally evil, and a sin." (Boston Globe, Diego Ribadeneira) People who call
themselves Catholics usually follow the church's rules. If they know it is a
sin and it will go against their beliefs why would they support the death
Cardinal Law was talking to Governor Paul Cellucci on this topic. The
Governor, who is a Catholic himself, strongly supports capital punishment.
He stated "I'm trying to do what I think is right for Massachusetts. I
happen to believe putting the death penalty on the books will deter a certain
amount of horrific violent crime." (Boston Globe, Diego Ribadeneira)
Through these statements it shows that Governor Cellucci and Cardinal Law
have two different views of how Catholics should think of the death penalty.
Looking at it as head of the church in Boston, Cardinal Law feels it is
morally wrong and it is a sin to have the death penalty. Paul Cellucci,
being a Catholic and the head politician in Massachusetts, feels it is a good
The Cardinal feels Cellucci, being a Catholic, should not want to
have capital punishment in his state. How can he call himself a Catholic
when the Cardinal flat out told him God is not for the death penalty? A
person's fait is in the hands of God not a jury.
"Certainly, in general, the punishment should fit the crime. But in
civilized society, we reject the, an eye for an eye, principle of literally
doing to criminals what they do to their victims. The penalty for rape
cannot be rape, or for arson, the burning down of the arsonists house. We
should not, therefore, punish the murderer with death. When the government
meets of vengeance disguised as justice, it becomes complicit with killers
undervaluing human life." (American Civil Liberties Union)
In conclusion, capital punishment is morally wrong. It is legal murder. The
government does not have the right to end a person's life or say when it
should end. The punishment should fit the crime. That is why criminals
should spend their lives in jail. Capital punishment should not be
implemented on Massachusetts.
Death penalty has been used for centuries to punish serious crimes. Crime in this aspect can be homicide, terrorism, espionage or treason among others. It varies from one country to another. Some countries in Asia, a drug conviction alone is enough for one to be executed. The debate on whether capital punishment is an effective means of hindering crimes of the above stated nature has been raging on for years, but research show that capital punishment is an effectual deterrent measure.
A survey done with the intent of finding out what the public opinion was, regarding the issue of capital punishment was conducted in the month of October 2013 by Gallup, a firm that specializes in research and analysis. They found that more than 50% supported this form of punishment. In addition to this, majority of people believed it was morally just and acceptable.
A study conducted by Zimmerman using state level data between 1978 and 1997 concluded that each execution resulted into a corresponding decrease in murder cases (14 less homicide) in that particular year. In addition to this Zimmerman noted that announcing to the general public that an offender will be executed had a potent effect on the population. Such announcements were effective in deterring future offenders. Findings by Zimmerman are further supported by research done by Dezhbakhsh, Rubin and Shepherd, which concluded that between 1977 and 1996 there were 18 fewer murders. This was based on empirical evidence from 3000 counties. Mocan and Gittings study also found that if laws are less strict and severe, there was a corresponding increase in murder cases. The data showed that for each execution there was a resulting decrease in murder rate but if death penalty was abolished there was an increase in murder rate.
There are conflicting findings that aim to dispute the effectiveness of the death penalty as a means of deterring serious crimes. For instance, a research done by Radelete and Lacock concluded that capital punishment is not an effective method in preventing serious crime. Their conclusion was reached after surveying various researches conducted by leading criminologists. The authors support life imprisonment as a substitute for capital punishment.
In conclusion, humans by nature fear death and pain, this innate quality can be utilized to prevent crime. When a potential murderer is in rage and she/he is about to assault his/her opponent, the thought that she/he might get caught, tried and sentenced to death is what prevents many people from just picking up a gun and killing whoever offends them. This measure is effective in deterring potential criminals. Death penalty is the right choice.