G729 G711 Comparison Essay

Please, wait while we are validating your browser

  • 1.

    Daengsi, T., Wutiwiwatchai, C., Preechayasomboon, A., Sukparungsee, S.: A Study of VoIP Quality Evaluation: User Perception of Voice Quality from G.729, G.711 and G.722. In: Proc. 9th IEEE-CCNC 2012, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 342–345 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Triyason, T., Kanthamanon, P.: Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality Measurement on Speex Codec VoIP with Tonal Language Thai. In: Proc. 5th International Conference IAIT, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 181–190 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Daengsi, T., et al.: The Development of a Thai Speech Set for Telephonometry, http://desceco.org/O-COCOSDA2010/proceedings/paper_53.pdf (accessed November 2012)

  • 4.

    Daengsi, T., Preechayasomboon, A., Sukparungsee, S., Wutiwiwatchai, C.: Thai Text Resource: A Recommended Thai Text Set for Voice Quality Measurements and Its Comparative Study. KKU Science Journal 40(4), 1114–1127 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 5.

    ITU-T Recommendation P.800 (Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality), http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.800-199608-I/en (accessed November 2012)

  • 6.

    Telchemy. Voice Quality Measurement (Application Note), http://www.telchemy.com/appnotes/TelchemyVoiceQualityMeasurement.pdf (accessed August 2013)

  • 7.

    Rango, F.D., et al.: Overview on VoIP: Subjective and Objective Measurement Methods. IJCSNC 6, 140–153 (2006)Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Daengsi, T., Sukparungsee, S., Wutiwiwatchai, C., Preechayasomboon, A.: Comparison of Perceptual Voice Quality of VoIP Provided by G.711 and G.729 Using Conversation-Opinion Tests. IJCIM 20(1), 21–26 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Daengsi, T., Wutiwiwatchai, C., Preechayasomboon, A., Sukparungsee, S.: VoIP Quality Measurement: Insignificant Voice Quality of G.711 and G.729 Codecs in Listening-Opinion Tests by Thai Users. Information Technology Journal 8(1), 77–82 (2012)Google Scholar

  • 10.

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?queryText%3DVoIP+Quality+E-model&addRange=2009_2013_Publication_Year&pageNumber=1&resultAction=REFINE (accessed August 2013)

  • 11.

    http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/search/searchresult.jsp?queryText%3DVoIP+Quality+PESQ&addRange=2009_2013_Publication_Year&pageNumber=1&resultAction=REFINE (accessed August 2013)

  • 12.

    Goudarzi, M., Sun, L.: Performance analysis and comparison of PESQ and 3SQM in live 3G mobile networks, http://www.tech.plym.ac.uk/spmc/staff/mgoudarzi/Performance%20analysis%20and%20comparison%20of%20PESQ%20and%203SQM.pdf (accessed August 2013)

  • 13.

    ITU-T Recommendation P.862. Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ): An objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone (2001) Google Scholar

  • 14.

    ITU-T Recommendation P.862.2. Wideband extension to Recommendation P.862 for the assessment of wideband telephone networks and speech codecs (November 2007) Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Karapantazis, S., Pavlidou, F.-N.: Voip: A comprehensive survey on a promising technology. Computer Networks 53, 2050–2090 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 16.

    Ditech Networls. Limitations of PESQ for Measuring Voice Quality in Mobile and VoIP Networks https://www.google.co.th/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDEQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.packagingdigest.com%2Ffile%2F4534-white_paper_on_the_limitations_of_PESQ.pdf%3Fforce%3Dtrue&ei= NTdFUoXmHIHQrQfU2oHoDw&usg=AFQjCNGKfvZ5aWrk_kD2wr8IkamNfku5zw&bvm=bv.53217764,d.bmk (accessed September 2013) Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Daengsi, T.: VoIP Quality Measurement: Recommendation of MOS and Enhance Objective Measurement Method for Standard Spoken Thai Language. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Information Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok (November 2012)Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Sodanil, M., Nitsuwat, S., Haruechaiyasak, C.: Thai Word Recognition Using Hybrid MLP-HMM. IJCSNS 10(3), 103–110 (2010)Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Wutiwiwatchai, C., Furui, S.: Thai speech processing technology: A review. Speech Communication 49, 8–27 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 20.

    Sittiprapaporn, W., Chindaduangratn, C., Kotchabhakdi, N.: Brain electric activity during the preattentive perception of speech sounds in tonal languages. SJST 26, 439–445 (2004)Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Sittiprapaporn, W., Chindaduangratn, C., Kotchabhakdi, N.: Functional Specialization of the Human Auditory Cortex in Processing of Speech Prosody: A Low Resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (LORETA) Study, http://anchan.lib.ku.ac.th/kukr/bitstream/003/17786/1/KC4205011.pdf (accessed December 2012)

  • 22.

    IEEE. Recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans. on Audio Electroacoust. 17(3), 225–246 (1969)Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Suayroop, K., et al.: A VoIP Quality Measurement Study with Thai Speech Sets Using PESQ and G.711A-law. In: Proc. 34th Electricall Engineering Conference (EECON-34), Chonburi, Thailand (2011)Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Sun, L., Ifeachor, E.: Perceived Speech Quality Prediction for Voice over IP-based Networks. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Communications 2002 (ICC 2002), New York, NY, pp. 2573–2577 (2002)Google Scholar

  • 25.

    Ren, J., Zhang, H., Zhu, Y., Goa, C.: Assessment of effects of different language in VOIP. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Audio, Language and Image Processing (ICALIP 2008), Shanghai, China, pp. 1624–1628 (2008)Google Scholar

  • 26.

    Daengsi, T., Wutiwiwatchai, C., Preechayasomboon, A., Sukparungsee, S.: Speech Quality Assessment of VoIP: G.711 VS G.722 Based on Interview Tests with Thai Users. IJITCS 4(2), 19–25 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • 27.

    ITU-T Recommendation P.862.3 (Application guide for objective quality measurement base on Recommendations P.862, P.862.1 and P.862.2) (November 2007) Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Annex B Speech files, ITU-T Recommendation P.501, http://www.itu.int/net/itu-/sigdb/genaudio/AudioForm-.aspx?val=10000501 (accessed August 2013)

  • Leave a Comment


    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *