1 Kigor

Conceptualize The Word Research Paper

  • Aiken, A.R.A., Dillaway, C., Mevs-Korff, N.: A blessing I can’t afford: factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy. Soc. Sci. Med. 132, 149–155 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Birks, M., Mills, J.: Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide, 2nd edn. Sage, London (2015)Google Scholar

  • Bloor, M., Wood, F.: Keywords in Qualitative Methods: A Vocabulary of Research Concepts. Sage, London (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Boddy, C.R.: Sample size for qualitative research. Qual. Mark. J. 19(4), 426–432 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bowen, G.A.: Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qual. Res. 8(1), 137–152 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Bryman, A.: How many qualitative interviews is enough? In: Baker, S.E., Edwards, R. (eds.) How Many Qualitative Interviews is Enough? Expert Voices and Early Career Reflections on Sampling and Cases in Qualitative Research, pp. 18–20. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton, Southampton (2012)Google Scholar

  • Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 3rd edn, pp. 507–535. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar

  • Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory as an emergent method. In: Hesse-Biber, S., Leavy, P. (eds.) Handbook of Emergent Methods, pp. 155–170. Guilford Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar

  • Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2014)Google Scholar

  • Constantinou, C., Georgiou, M., Perdikogianni, M.: A comparative method for themes saturation (CoMeTS) in qualitative interviews. Qual. Res. (2017). doi:10.1177/1468794116686650Google Scholar

  • Damschroder, L.J., Pritts, J.L., Neblo, M.A., Kalarickal, R.J., Creswell, J.W., Hayward, R.A.: Patients, privacy and trust: patients’ willingness to allow researchers to access their medical records. Soc. Sci. Med. 64(1), 223–235 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Denny, E.: “I never know from one day to another how I will feel”: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qual. Health Res. 19(7), 985–995 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Dey, I.: Grounding Grounded Theory: Guidelines for Qualitative Inquiry. Academic Press, San Diego (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Dey, I.: Grounding categories. In: Bryant, A., Charmaz, K. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory, pp. 167–190. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2007)Google Scholar

  • Drisko, J.W.: Strengthening qualitative studies and reports. J. Soc. Work Educ. 33(1), 185–187 (1997)Google Scholar

  • Dubé, E., Vivion, M., Sauvageau, C., Gagneur, A., Gagnos, R., Guay, M.: “Nature does things well, why should we interfere?”: vaccine hesitancy among mothers. Qual. Health Res. 26(3), 411–425 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Forsberg, A., Bäckman, L., Möller, A.: Experiencing liver transplantation: a phenomenological approach. J. Adv. Nurs. 32(2), 327–334 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • France, N.E.M., Farrell, K., Kearney, B., Myatt, S.: Women living with fibromyalgia: “do no harm”. Int. J. Hum. Caring 12(4), 21–25 (2008)Google Scholar

  • Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwhistle, V., Eccles, M.P., Grimshaw, J.M.: What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-driven interview studies. Psychol. Health 25(10), 1229–1245 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Fusch, P.I., Ness, L.R.: Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual. Rep. 20(9), 1408–1416 (2015)Google Scholar

  • Ganle, J.K.: Hegemonic masculinity, HIV/AIDS risk perception and sexual behavior change among young people in Ghana. Qual. Health Res. 26(6), 763–781 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Garrett, C.R., Gask, L.L., Hays, R., Cherrington, A., Bundy, C., Dickens, C., Waheed, W., Coventry, P.A.: Accessing primary health care: a meta-ethnography of the experiences of British South Asian patients with diabetes, coronary heart disease or a mental health problem. Chronic Illn. 8(2), 135–155 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Given, L.M.: 100 Questions (and Answers) About Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2016)Google Scholar

  • Glaser, B.G.: Theoretical Sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1978)Google Scholar

  • Glaser, B.G.: Emergence vs Forcing: Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis. Sociology Press, Mill Valley (1992)Google Scholar

  • Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago (1967)Google Scholar

  • Grady, M.P.: Qualitative and Action Research: A Practitioner Handbook. Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation, Bloomington (1998)Google Scholar

  • Goulding, C.: Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology: a comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. Eur. J. Mark. 39(3/4), 294–308 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Guest, G., Bunce, A., Johnson, L.: How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18(1), 59–82 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hale, E.D., Treharne, G.J., Kitas, G.D.: Qualitative methodologies II: a brief guide to applying interpretative phenomenological analysis in musculoskeletal care. Musculoskelet. Care 6(2), 86–96 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hancock, M.E., Amankwaa, L., Revell, M.A., Mueller, D.: Focus group data saturation: a new approach to data analysis. Qual. Rep. 21(11), 2124–2130 (2016)Google Scholar

  • Hawkins, R.L., Abrams, C.: Disappearing acts: the social networks of formerly homeless individuals with co-occurring disorders. Soc. Sci. Med. 65(10), 2031–2042 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hennink, M.M., Kaiser, B.N., Marconi, V.C.: Code saturation versus meaning saturation: how many interviews are enough? Qual. Health Res. 27(4), 591–608 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Hill, C.L., Baird, W.O., Walters, S.J.: Quality of life in children and adolescents with osteogenesis imperfecta: a qualitative interview based study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 12, 54 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, D., Daly, J., Davidson, P., Elliott, D.: Women recovering from first-time myocardial infarction (MI): a feminist qualitative study. J. Adv. Nurs. 32(6), 1403–1411 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

  • Jackson, M., Harrison, P., Swinburn, B., Lawrence, M.: Using a qualitative vignette to explore a complex public health issue. Qual. Health Res. 25(10), 1395–1409 (2015)CrossRef

  • Conceptualizing Addiction Paper

    1038 WordsMay 26th, 20155 Pages

    Conceptualizing Addiction Paper
    Kristina Lamey
    May 25, 2015
    David Elkins

    Conceptualizing Addiction Paper The history of addiction goes back centuries, and unfortunately, there is still a long way to go for people to realize the effects of chemical substances do more harm than good. The difference between drug use and abuse relies heavily on a person’s dependence on the substance. The line between the differences is often very fine. Depending on other factors involved, such as morals, values, environment, and genetic predisposition, the line will most likely be crossed without regard to the consequences until treatment and recovery are the only options left. This is essay compares two theoretical explanations…show more content…

    However, usually, a multi-treatment approach is necessary. Psychological models focus on the emotion and the mind, while biological models, as discussed next, find that addictive behaviors depend on the structure and chemistry in the body’s genetic makeup.
    The Biological Model “The statistical associations between genetic factors and alcohol abuse are very strong” (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). However, there is still much debate over the validity of genetics as a definite cause for addiction. Perhaps, the reason for this is because the number of children of alcoholics that go on to become alcoholics is still small. Additionally, genetic predisposition cannot explain the number of cases of alcoholics that did not come from alcoholic parents or families. In fact, addiction can be so prominent, that it remains even after the drug use has ended (McNeece & DiNitto, 2012). Therefore, the biological theory should not be ruled as it is based on what takes place in the body. There is no other theory that can explain how a person could still have addiction symptoms when the substance is absent from their system. Predisposition implies that there is a mutation or malfunction in the body that appears to cause a craving or susceptibility to becoming addicted to a substance.

    Comparing Psychological and Biological Models Both of the psychological and biological models explain addiction. In addition, both models take a holistic approach in their arguments. They simply

    Show More

    Leave a Comment


    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *